Arts

IHC 2014: Musicfest

Reading Time: 7 minutes

By Lu Jinyao (14A01D) and Joyce Er (15A01A)
Photos by Isaac Siaw (15S03Q)
Cover photo by Matthew Yeo of Raffles Photographic Society

Last Friday night, IHC Remix kicked off with Musicfest, a three-hour music extravaganza featuring various interpretations of pop, classical and rock pieces. Whether students were there to support their friends, their house, or even to relax after a long week, Musicfest proved to be enjoyable for all.

Throwing together a performance in two weeks is no mean feat, and the criteria for this year’s competition, organised by Chamber Ensemble, did not make things any easier for participants. In 10 to 15 minutes, each house was to put up one classical re-arrangement of a pop song, and the reverse: one re-arrangement of a classical piece in any other form. Judging that night’s performances were Ms Michelle Kwok (our GP teacher), Mr Jarrod Lee (an ex-teacher with Broadway-style vocal experience) and Mr Hazli (our very own sound technician).

What makes a good performance? Houses were rewarded for audience engagement, technical proficiency and diversity of instruments onstage. An additional, unspoken criteria which affected audience engagement was song choice. Although many Rafflesians have some form of musical background, those who don’t tend to be able to identify with and appreciate more mainstream pop/rock tunes, while obscure songs let the audience’s minds wander.

BB’s Nicholas Quek’s guzheng rendition of a pop song entertained and enthralled the audience.
BB’s Nicholas Quek’s guzheng rendition of a pop song entertained and enthralled the audience.

As a whole, houses fared well in terms of technical proficiency. Many of the Musicfest participants are H2 Music students or members of various performing arts CCAs, which heightened the baseline standard. The performers taking the stage were individually capable and many were well rehearsed, which showed in their confident performances and the fact that few needed to refer to their score sheets. Individual highlights included Nicholas Quek of BB with his invigorating guzheng take on If I Lose Myself, and MR’s drummer, Shaun Mak, who provided the perfect rhythm for MR’s power vocalists Jonathan Boey and Esther Chan’s with their rendition of Where Have You Been. HH vocalist Melissa Tang’s sultry vocals shone during her jazzy performance of her house cheer in song form, drawing audible gasps from the audience, while HH’s piano rendition of Erlkonig, especially the sustained ostinato in the bass, was technically stunning.

Of course, the performances were not judged on the basis of individual competency – Mavis Tan, who helped with arranging MT’s set list, said, “The important thing about a performance is that it must be put together, on time, and in tune.” The challenge of including a diversity of instruments and unifying each instrument’s distinctive sound added a new dimension of complexity to the competition. Over the course of the night’s performance, an eclectic mix of instruments from the suona to the egg shaker made their appearance onstage. As Mr Lee said, while all performers were individually proficient, it was working together to produce a cohesive set piece that truly tested each house’s abilities.

BB took the stage as one team and impressed the audience with their fluid arrangement which also left room for showcasing individual talent.
BB took the stage as one team and impressed the audience with their fluid arrangement which also left room for showcasing individual talent.

Ultimately, Musicfest had as much to do with good arrangements and capable performers as it did with good teamwork. BB’s strategy in the competition was inclusive and got everyone on board while letting each individual shine. As Daniel Ang, BB’s double bassist and co-composer puts it, they were able to come up with “a seamless and complete package, where each of the segments were closely linked to each other,” despite the changes in genre from pop to classical. He added, “Also, we felt that the space created by transitions could be used to showcase the solo abilities of our performers, giving them room to creatively express themselves while still being part of the team concept!” Their performance was also punctuated by percussion instruments for comedic effect, which kept audience members entertained and enhanced the atmosphere of their performance.

It goes without saying that the amount of effort put into the process was integral to determining each house’s outcome. BB on decided their repertoire the very day competition requirements were released. This enabled them to finish composing and begin rehearsals more than a week before the actual event. Practicing up to five hours a day in the leadup to Musicfest took serious dedication from each member of the team. Indeed, BB’s unbroken melody seemed well-rehearsed, and while there were minor slip ups in the otherwise powerful vocal performances by Emma Lau and Lorraine Fong, the overall reception to their performance was positive.

The level of preparedness each house had made a huge impact on the chemistry of performers on stage. Houses that fared better in engaging the crowd, featured performances that were more cohesive and overall allowed for a strong performance. One such combination was MR’s pairing of Jonathan Boey and Esther Chan on vocals. When asked about the chemistry between him and Esther, Jonathan said, “Her skill level and confidence also made it easier for both of us to communicate and understand where the other was going during the performance itself. It also helped that we got along in general, which is an important thing when you’re making music with other people.”

HH’s team was prepared enough that sheet music was unnecessary.
HH’s team was prepared enough that sheet music was unnecessary.

Those in attendance that night might also remember that HH was the only house that didn’t use sheet music onstage – again a testament to their confidence. Said Casey Chan, HH’s violinist, “I think that intuition, creativity and the ability to improvise, rather than the following of a fixed music score, are core traits of true musicians that the HH team have emulated well in Musicfest.” Another benefit of not needing scores was that the stage looked less cluttered, and the HH team, more cohesive.

BW’s Gordon Kang on the drums during a piano/drums duet with Dean Fu (not pictured).
BW’s Gordon Kang on the drums during a piano/drums duet with Dean Fu (not pictured).

Determined to impress, BW decided to take a chance with a self-composed song, titled Mimblegrimble. BW’s Gordon Kang said that his original song performed during Musicfest was not a last-minute composition, but something he composed a while ago and dusted off for this competition: “I hate forcing out music so I thought it’ll be more interesting to start with sometimes refreshing and original.” In a stroke of creative genius, they also performed a memorable, fast-paced piano/drums duet rendition of Moonlight Sonata 3rd Movement, which, again, distinguished them from the rest.

However, it wasn’t smooth sailing for all houses. Over the course of Musicfest preparation, each house inevitably met with their fair share of difficulties, which contributed to the quality of their final performance. As with any team effort, coordination is necessary, and for HH, their biggest challenges during rehearsals originated from technical difficulties, and the difficulty of coordinating rhythm and tempo.

Despite a relative lack of preparation, MT’s team put up a commendable performance.
Despite a relative lack of preparation, MT’s team put up a commendable performance.

Prior to the big day, rumours that MT had only started rehearsals on Wednesday were circulating. These were confirmed by Ace Tay, who played the trombone during their performance. Said Ace, “There were only three or four practices. We only decided on the songs in the first practice, and decided to play This Is War two hours before Musicfest.” This was perhaps because, according to Stefanus, their vocalist, no Musicfest IC was officially appointed for MT, and preparations only began in earnest the Saturday before. More remarkable is the fact that Shawn Chan, their drummer, was in fact recruited as a pianist and learned to play the drums a day before Musicfest to compensate for their a general lack of diverse instruments, including the drums. That said, it is a testament to these performers’ grit and their dedication to their craft that these houses managed to pull through and put up a commendable performance.

At the end of the night’s performances, and after a brief segment by Rock to tide over the audience while the judges were deliberating, the results were released:

1st: BB

2nd (tied): BW and MR

3rd: HH

4th: MT

The judges specifically pointed out that sound imbalance was a recurring leitmotif among all the houses – that the loudness of the electric guitar and drums, for instance, drowned out the rest of the ensemble. Also, occasionally, in the attempt to max the number of instruments, the outcome was more of a dissonant. Consequently, BB’s win was probably due to their seamless arrangement, evident in Ms Kwok’s parting comments, ‘Think of music as a soundscape: you can design the sounds that you want to create… but [an instrument] has to either cut through or blend, not stick out like a sore thumb’. From the looks of it, BB managed to achieve that precise blend. Mr. Jarrod Lee pointed out that many singers tried too hard to emulate an American style, and advised the performers to ‘find your own voice, your own beat, your own style’.

Ultimately, one needs to accept that a one-time performance always leaves as many regrets for the performers as awe it gives to the audience. Due to nervousness, or the lack of time to pursue perfection, stage performances rarely reflect the hundred percent ability of individuals. Beyond the music technicalities, we are even more impressed by the amount of effort and dedication each house invested to see a performance from its start to the end.

For first-time participants especially, Musicfest was a valuable learning opportunity, allowing BB’s Emma Lau to “learn and develop the technical skills of the pop/rock genre”, while seeing firsthand “how instruments come together”.

More than that, we are certain that what participants took away from Musicfest was not the final judging, but the seeds of friendship sown. Indeed, as HH’s Casey Chan said, “The Musicfest experience was definitely a great one for me – through overcoming challenges and making music with the HH Musicfest team, I’m glad to say that I’ve made many new friends and had lots of fun. What was also heartening was what happened right after Musicfest – Regardless of result, musicians from different houses came together in the amphitheatre to jam, revelling in the music that they enjoyed in common.” Or, in the words of Koh Kai Jie, chairperson of Chamber Ensemble, “The final results are meaningless numbers as long as the houses outdo themselves and enjoy the process.”

5 More Minutes of Your Life You’re Never Getting Back

Reading Time: 3 minutes

by Angelica Chong (14A01B)

1489208_10201939415820949_1837254057_n

1.5 Hours of Your Life You’re Never Getting Back: A Preview

It’s a Thursday night. Too late in the week to have any energy to finish (or should it be or perhaps start) your work, still 24 more hours to go before you can head out on a Friday night. Instead of laughing at cute cat videos at home by your lonesome, why not come to the PAC and laugh at your schoolmates, with your schoolmates, instead?

Where can I sign up?!!! you desperately ask, relieved to be free from adorable animals that you will never get to hold and cherish. And what is this preview for, anyway?

It’s for the so very adroitly named 1.5 Hours of Your Life You’re Never Getting Back: a one-of-a-kind (perhaps thankfully so!) performance, featuring our very own students directing and acting in two plays, one a slapstick satire and the other a literal ‘comedy of errors’, as well as performing a few of the most famous monologues in literature in between. Rest assured, you’ll get your money’s worth—and if not, you can always angrily approach any HP student for a refund/get a mob together, buy a couple of pitchforks, and go after the nearest hapless HPer for a refund. (I’m kidding. There will be no refunds as I’ve been told all proceeds will go straight to buying a flat-screen TV for LT6.) (That was also a joke.

King Lea— er, Kin Lee Er

King Lear? You pull back in horror as you read this. Wasn’t this supposed to be fun? Before you let any literature teachers catch you lamenting about the unfun-ness of Shakespeare, however, fret not—this isn’t just any ordinary play about a king and his avaricious daughters who drive him to madness and death; what   the HPers have done with it is to use this premise and convert it into an ode to the vagaries of the local political scene. Call it blasphemy or genius or anything in between, but you’ll be undoubtedly entertained by the satirical twists in this new and improved, Singaporeanified version of the bard’s famous play. Since poking fun at our political leaders is every Singaporean’s favourite past-time, it’s pretty much got universal appeal. You definitely won’t have to pull up Sparknotes in the middle of this play to enjoy it.

Pride at Southanger Park

Everyone knows that feeling—when you’re watching a performance on stage, and suddenly someone messes up (forgetting their lines, breaking a prop, falling, farting, what have you) and you literally cannot bear to watch. Ah, the pains of second-hand embarrassment. Watching Pride at Southanger Park, though, you can leave those worries behind you. Rupert Bean’s Pride at Southanger Park is a piece of coarse acting, which takes aim at the blunders of amateur theatre by taking the very concept to its disastrous extreme. By bald-facedly parodying these bloopers and blunders, it’s hoped that theatre-goers will forget about the—at times—snobbish intellectualism of theatre, or the subtextual meaning behind every stage direction, and just enjoy themselves by having a good laugh.  Of course, if you think about it, it’s easy for bad actors to act badly, or for good ones to make honest mistakes. For our budding home-grown actors, who cannot be labelled ‘stupendous’ but surely not ‘horrendous’, to act acting badly—well, that just might be a tad more tricky.

Oration through the Ages

If watching many people speaking on stage isn’t really your thing, maybe watching one person speaking on stage is. While listening to a lone figure rant and rave on stage for what seems to be an interminable period of time seems deathly boring, you might just enjoy this one. From Blanche DuBois to Shylock the Jew, the monologues being performed vary so much in theme, time period, and tone that they will be anything but monotonous. (However, if at the end of the day they still don’t rock your boat, you can always tune out the performers and make up your own words to amuse yourself. I’m sure no one will notice.)

Details

23rd January, Thursday, 7.00pm (doors open at 6.45pm) at the PAC (RI Y5-6 side)

Tickets go at $5, and you can get them from the canteen booth on the 22nd Jan (Wed), or order online at http://tinyurl.com/1point5hours. Alternatively, probably less attractively, approach any Year 6 HP student!

If you’re still on the fence, visit https://www.facebook.com/events/268811453274387/ for more details!

Raffles Players Presents: The Visit

Reading Time: 4 minutes

By Austin Zheng 14A01B
Additional Reporting by Gao Wenxin 14A03A

The Visit_Matthew Yeo-51

‘I know what the world’s like. Because I own it.’
– Claire Zachanassian

Would you kill for a million pounds?

Yes, you would.

Such is the inevitable conclusion of the Raffles Players’ rendition of The Visit, a 1956 tragicomedy by Friedrich Dürrenmatt. A chilling tale of human weakness and wickedness, The Visit follows the inhabitants of an impoverished town named Guellen as they slowly cave in to temptation, accepting the offer of millionairess Claire Zachanassian and killing her former lover, Alfred Ill, for a million pounds.

The Visit_Matthew Yeo-25

It is particularly difficult to perform tragicomic plays well, since the actors have to deftly manoeuvre between the comic and tragic aspects, and ensure that they complement, rather than undermine, each other. The Players did manage to pull it off (made an admirable effort to pull it off), but their comedy fell short one too many times. This was due to the play’s darker portions overshadowing the humour, imperfect comic timing, or even the inherent blandness of some self-inserted jokes. Puns like ‘Are you ill? / No, I’m scared!’, for instance, failed to elicit an audience response amidst the frightened desperation of Alfred Ill. Furthermore, the more light-hearted scenes at the start of the play were diminished by their confusing, muddled nature. The inconsistent humour was unfortunate, especially since the comedy was largely executed well, with several uproariously funny moments.

The Visit_Matthew Yeo-2

Overall, the production was very enjoyable, in large part due to the adept acting. Aaheli Tarafdar was the star of the show, commanding the stage as the twisted, imperious and tragic Claire Zachanassian. One caveat, however, is that Aaheli did not portray her character’s sorrow, indignation or bittersweet, distorted love as convincingly as her callous dominance. Even when Claire Zachanassian was reminiscing about her childhood love and abandonment with Alfred in Konrad’s Village Wood, Aaheli’s tone remained predominantly haughty. While her gestures and expressions hinted at a greater complexity to Claire Zachanassian, her tone and the speed of her delivery did not quite mesh with her changing emotions, resulting in a largely one-dimensional, though nonetheless admirable, portrayal of her character.

The Visit_Matthew Yeo-20

The play’s lead actor, Ejaz Latiff, was also exceptional as Alfred Ill, being smoothly charismatic as a lover, aggressively paranoid as a victim of persecution, and calmly resigned as a man who had accepted his fate. And though he was a supporting actor, Aeron Ee deserves special mention with a magnificent performance as the mayor, alternatingly bumbling, grave, pained and casually threatening. Unfortunately, some of the other actors were less polished, with their performances suffering from irritating accents, insipid gestures, or even incomprehensible screaming. This made certain scenes, such as the townspeople’s scrambled preparation for Claire Zachanassian’s arrival at the start of the play, rather bewildering.

The Visit_Cinematic_Matthew Yeo-9

A particularly outstanding aspect of the production was the Players’ alterations in their casting, which also reinforced The Visit’s surrealistic undertones. Faced with a lack of manpower for the original play’s large cast, they replaced Claire Zachanassian’s husbands with hand puppets that were controlled by her butler. The puppets illustrated the husbands’ disposability, facelessness, foolishness and complete subservience, bringing a new dimension to Claire Zachanassian’s line ‘You only have husbands for display purposes, they shouldn’t be useful.’ Similarly, the mayor’s wife and grandchildren were replaced by cardboard cut-outs, emphasising how he also primarily used them for decorative purposes. Indeed, the innovative way in which the Players simultaneously resolved their practical problems and illuminated The Visit’s thematic concerns was nothing short of impressive.

The Visit_Matthew Yeo-9

Conversely, the set changes were far from ideal, with the stage hands being clearly visible and audible for extended periods of time. This soon became distracting after multiple scene changes. Consequently, the emotional impact of certain scenes were undercut, most notably hindering the audience from fully digesting the implications of Claire Zachanassian’s ominous ‘I’ll wait’ as she expressed a cold confidence that the townspeople would eventually murder Alfred. The constant switching of spotlights from Alfred to Claire Zachanassian during the balcony scene was also jarring. The sets themselves, though, were well-crafted, and the lighting atmospheric, allowing the audience to visualise the derelict Guellen and appreciate the play’s simple, rural setting. The neat, well-stocked shelves and soft lighting of Alfred Ill’s weathered shop, for instance, gave an impression of a man (initially) comfortable in his hometown, despite its poverty.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Ultimately, while the production did have considerable room for improvement, it was a remarkable and memorable performance that overcame its flaws, with the play becoming more engaging as it progressed. Nevertheless, it is a true pity that the Players did not quite live up to their vast potential, given the solid cast and insightful alterations.

Raffles Voices, Raffles Chorale and Raffles Singers present: Vocal Exploits XXIII

Reading Time: 6 minutes

By Daniella Low (14A01B)

Photos by Carol Yuen

Rumour had it that the concert was half-sold out before tickets were even released to the school population. Much of the ticket sales went to family and friends of the performers, making Vocal Exploits XXIII as much of an intimate sharing of music, as it was a showcase of the choirs’ vocal mastery and musicianship. It was thus with great anticipation that the audience waited for the concert to begin. Continue reading “Raffles Voices, Raffles Chorale and Raffles Singers present: Vocal Exploits XXIII”

Raffles Reviews: The Phantom of the Opera

Reading Time: 5 minutes

By Kylie Wong (14A01B) and Lim Shaomin (14S03K)

*Spoilers alert

Yards of scarlet curtain, a chorus of golden angels, a precariously hanging chandelier- the Opera Garnier is the majestic setting of the strange events that occurred in the 1880s
Yards of scarlet curtain, a chorus of golden angels, a precariously hanging chandelier- the Opera Garnier is the majestic setting of the strange events that occurred in the 1880s

Settle in your seats, ladies and gentlemen! The Phantom of the Opera is back in Singapore, and with the Marina Bay Sands theatre as the lush setting of its two month run, one can expect nothing less than to be dazzled and swept away by the masterpiece of well- known impresario Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber.

Continue reading “Raffles Reviews: The Phantom of the Opera”