As the week progresses, results from our long-dreaded CTs begin to slowly drip in. At this juncture, we’re sure you may be anxious or maybe just curious about the level’s performance– which may be telling of your own results. Whether some may find it relieving or frustrating, the rumour mill this year hasn’t yielded many especially revealing facts. Nonetheless, we’d like to remind our readers to exercise healthy levels of discretion as they read the rumours – without further ado, here they are:
General Paper:
The level’s overall performance was not outstanding, but also not exceptionally bad – though objectively, the average grade was heard to be a D.
Question 11: “Should society pay more attention to the needs of criminals?” was leaked to be the hardest question in the entire paper by a GP tutor. We sincerely wish all the best to the brave souls who attempted it.
80% of the J1s who attempted the media question for GP failed their essay.
Yes, legends who score nearly full marks for the comprehension paper exist.
Knowledge and Inquiry
An insider tells us that “the performance for KI was a lot better than GP”.
Mathematics:
“Functions was an area that the level needed to work more on”
Most ex and current Math RA students finished the paper with more than 40 minutes before the end of the paper.
The average grade in HP is a E
Someone scored 1/65 out of the whole paper
Considering how GCs were frantically dropped onto the tables or even floors (out of panic), students were not the only party scathed by the CTs
Chemistry:
80% of students failed the MCQ. Overall, 70% students failed the subject.
Careless mistakes in questions related to Chemical Energistics were the downfall of countless, countless students
Energy Cycle diagrams were generally not as well done as expected
There was a horror story of somebody who gave up after attempting Section A, and handed in blank scripts for both Sections B and C
One legend forgot to bring an eraser and couldn’t change his wrong answer but still got 14/15 for MCQ
Physics:
Performance for the MCQ was average, the outlook for sections B and C are more bleak
A Physics RA class’s MCQ average was 12/14, while the school average was 7.6/14
Students found the entire paper esoteric and obscure
30% of students failed
Biology:
The essay question was badly attempted, insiders tell us that the answers were insufficiently precise
Dodgy insights tell us that 40% of the level failed, and only 8% received an A
On the other hand: Performance for the MCQ was okay, with people getting 26 or 28/30 easily
Economics:
The highest score for the Case Study paper was 21/30
There are horror stories of students sleeping after writing 5 lines into their essay
Even scarier horror story of someone wrote 6 pages for essay within 45 minutes (which is in no way common)
Some students misinterpreted “monopolist” to mean “actors in monopolistic competition”, resulting in devastating penalizations
History:
The average grade across the level is a C
Teachers agree that students needed to understand the needs of the questions more, ie the difference between “Assess…” and “Why…”
Both International and SEA Hist’s performances were nearly the same standard
Highest score for History in HP was 37/50 overall
Geography:
Scores were on average better for the Physical Geography component than the Human Geography section this time around, which a tutor found “weird”.
Literature:
The issue at the heart of the poem in the Victorian Lit segment was not women, but apparently the senses of Duty in the Victorian era instead.
The performance for Reading Lit exceeded that of Vic Lit
A horror story of a student who took a 15 minute break because he was “[expletive] anyway”
Then again one student wrote 5 pages for Paper 1 and reportedly scored full marks.
While curiosity very often kills the cat, we hope you’ve survived after reading our rumours. Raffles Press would like to remind our readers that it’s never too late to prepare before the upcoming Promos, no matter how students have fared this time, and we wish them all the best for their results!
By Qiu Kexin (16A13A) and Chew Cheng Yu (16S06L)
Photos courtesy of Mr Toh Ban Sheng, Keane Chua and Raffles Voices
As the smartly dressed performers took their places centre stage, a hush instantly fell over the audience within the newly refurbished space of Victoria Concert Hall. It was thus that the three starring acts for the night – Raffles Chorale, alumni choir Raffles Singers and their Year 1-4 counterpart Raffles Voices – made a sparkling entrance for their annual arts performance Vocal Exploits 2015, immediately filling the hall with comforting, dulcet sighs of one impressive choir overlooking fully-packed turnout.
Held to raise funds for Nepal in the wake of the devastating earthquakes in April, the theme for this year’s concert was Canticum in Natura (Latin for ‘Songs in Nature’). True to its name, the concert showcased a stunning repertoire variously inspired by the beauty and majesty of our natural environment. The theme took on an even deeper throughout the musical extravaganza, as the many songs recalled the joy of appreciating Nature and her vicarious gifts — perhaps an experience made particularly poignant to an audience accustomed to city life in concrete jungles.
The concert started on a high note, opening with Cantate Domino (‘Sing to the Lord’) by Josu Elberdin, which pervaded the atmosphere with pleasant clarity of voices, as the singers passionately produced rousing chants, united as one ensemble.
Following that, in the concert’s first half, the rest of the songs included various works centering around the celebration of the human spirit. I Carry Your Heart with Me (originally a poem by E. E. Cummings) was a gently euphonious song about enduring love, accompanied by sweet felicitous notes played by violinist Carolyn Au (16S03F).
In contrast, Hentakan Jiwa (‘Beat of My Soul’ in Bahasa Indonesia) by Ken Steven was notable for its stirring Indonesian percussionistic rhythm, which Raffles Voices created through clapping and stomping when they took over the stage — evocative of the strength of a beating human heart. In Beati Quorum Via (from Psalm 119:1, Latin for ‘Blessed Are Those Whose Way’), a religious hymn, the choralists blended voices both high and low as well as booming vocals together into one resounding whole.
Those present were able to hear a sundry of different languages throughout the various pieces, some comprehensible to us, some completely foreign – but they had not detracted from the audience’s enjoyment of the plaintive music and instead, as the music went on, they managed to move the audience in their seats simply through the emotional passion of the performers’ elegant voices, communicating in the wordless yet inspiringly universal tongue of music. In particular, there was Stars I Shall Find by David Dickau. With a mellow touch of piano accompaniment and spirited expression, it stood out for its optimistic message of keeping oneself afloat and finding hope amidst adversity.
Raffles Chorale performing in the picturesque setting of Victoria Concert Hall.
After the intermission, the audience saw Raffles Singers, comprising of chorale alumni, taking the stage alongside their juniors for some notable performances. There was a noticeable shift in mood due to the transition, through changes in song choice, to a lighter listening experience – while the atmosphere was still solemn during some pieces, most of the works included were contemporary pieces, which made for a musical style more aurally engaging for younger members of the teeming audience.
The sombre ones – fewer in number this time round – included the notable The Lonesome Road arranged by Simon Carrington, which mixed soulful melodies with contemplative lines about solitude (“Walk down that lonesome road all by yourself / Don’t turn your head back over your shoulder”), to create a song which was deeply introspective.
In their rendition of Gloria by contemporary South Korean composer Hyo-Won Woo, the performers brought to life the piece’s richly nuanced and unique fusion of Eastern musical influences with a rearranged, but still quintessentially Latin, hymn. Our choir efficaciously recreated the might and regality associated with Latin chorale music – combined with their execution of traditional Korean music tempos which had been incorporated into the song, the performance was nothing short of a rousing crowdpleaser.
La Cucaracha, a Mexican folk song, livened up the whole venue with its light-hearted and jovial tunes. Pervaded by the catchy repetitions of ‘ba dum da’ that compelled one to dance along with the rhythm, it ended with a loud, enthusiastic shout of “Olé!” which cracked up many in the audience.
Pamugun, from one of the Philippines’ most prominent composers Francisco Feliciano, was unfolded to the expectant listeners by Raffles Singers. It was a challenging piece better suited for the more seasoned alumni; the song (which told the story of a desperate hunter chasing a bird) tested the waters of typical concert fare, not just because of its rapid-speed rhythm which demanded much vocal agility, but also for a few surprises throughout the song, such as a loud, unexpected shriek halfway which shocked the audience. In all, it was one of the more outstanding performances, demonstrating the mastery of our alumni choristers and rounding off the concert well with a delightful dose of what was unusual.
The next piece brought in several new instruments, such as a cymbal, a bass drum, handbells, and many more curious musical implements. Cloudburst by Eric Whitacre — about the breathtaking wonders of nature big and small — was an intriguing piece: snapping fingers became raindrops, a thunder sheet with the bass drum became thunder; the song slowly built a storm to its crescendo, before leaving the sounds to ebb away gradually. With a slight dream-like quality with the ringing of handbells, the audience was entranced by the thunderstorm that grew in the hall, into a storm which received thunderous applause at the end – truly well-deserved in our opinion, considering the song had been one of the most challenging of the lot to choralist Adrian Wang (16A13A), since it had been “substantially long” while necessitating the seamless “weaving together of voices and several instruments”.
Last but not least, the chorale groups concluded the concert by singing the Institution Anthem upon requests for an encore, as per Chorale’s tradition. There was an invitation extended to all Rafflesians present to join in with them – which they did, boldly singing together in what was a joyous and stirring rendition of the Anthem.
All attention is on the performers, as they conclude their song.
Looking back on the eventful night, the first thing one could have praised Raffles Chorale would have been, right off the bat, their ability to work with all the chosen songs from dissimilar composers or artists, and yet still present a coherent and unified theme of celebrating our world overall. The result was a smooth show that had been enjoyable for both the viewers as well as the performers. No less impressively, their performance that night showed no signs of sloppiness or disorganisation despite being prepared within just a few months – the chorale members were all deeply engaged in their own performances, swaying along to the music as they sang. The solo performances were similarly impressive; they supplemented character and depth to the song with much enthusiasm. No wonder it had been enjoyable to such a degree for the performers then, as Adrian Wang also revealed that the chorale groups had found “performing in the Victoria Concert Hall for the first time a highly breathtaking experience.”
Having said that, another area that had impressed was definitely the choice of so many — up till then — oft-unheard pieces hailing from a diversity of cultures around the globe. The general consensus was that the repertoire had achieved an enlightening and eye-opening showcase of music which could have largely gone unnoticed by the average music-lover otherwise. The unique and slightly quirky setlist had come about because “Chorale wouldn’t be performing for the Singapore Youth Festival this year,” recalled Mr Toh Ban Sheng, director of Canticum in Natura. “We had more freedom in choosing our repertoire, so [we took] the opportunity to perform long works with various instruments.”
For seasoned music aficionados, the originality of some notable pieces – manifest in the recreation of nature’s sounds in Cloudburst, and the seamless, yet whimsical alternation between fast-paced bars and slow cries of Pamugun – would have delighted. There had been no lack of thrills for the casual listener there either: the songs had taken the audience on an emotional roller-coaster, riding from the high of sprightly jingles, to the sobering melancholy of some sad ballads.
And as for the average student there, there had certainly been some pieces with timbres mostly unfamiliar to them in this day and age (austere works such as Gloria or Beati Quorum via). Still, in the bigger picture, that mattered little because at its core, the whole affair in Victoria Concert Hall had been a sincere performance with the best mix of chosen pieces, marked by the choirs’ emotional conveyance of the human heart and soul through the sheer will of voice alone.
Setlist
Cantate Domino by Josu Elberdin
Stars I Shall Find by David Dickau
The New Moon by Ēriks Ešenvalds
Sonnet 43 by Kelly Tang
Hentakan Jiwa (World Premiere) by Ken Steven
If May I Fall In Love Again (World Premiere) by John Pamintuan
I Carry Your Heart with Me by Randall Stroope
Cantico de Celebración by Leo Brouwer
Beati quorum via by Charles Villiers Stanford
Gloria by Hyo-won Woo
That Lonesome Road by James Taylor, arranged by Simon Carrington
Contrapunto bestiale alla mente by Adriano Banchieri
La Cucaracha arranged by Robert Sund
Yver, vous n’estes qu’un villain by Claude Debussy
Ever wanted to rant about that someone you just can’t stand? Overwhelmed with too many feelings? Check out Raffles Press’ new column, Ask Aunt Agony and Uncle Upset, and our resident Aunties and Uncles will be glad to help you with your Rafflesian troubles! Submit your confessions to tinyurl.com/rafflesadvicecolumn and we’ll give them our best shot.
By Adelyn Tan (16A01E) and Choo Shuen Ming (16A01E)
Feeling the stress from CTs? Unable to find a perfect place where you can focus and get down to work? Study Go Where? is a series featuring potential study locations suggested by Rafflesians, accompanied by brief overviews of their studying suitability – so you can find out without having to visit it! This will be our last edition of Study Go Where? for the June holidays this year, but if you’re still clueless on where you can study, check out previous reviews here and here!
In this special edition of Study Go Where?, Raffles Press brings to you priceless study places that cost (next to) nothing to occupy. Be prepared for varying levels of humidity and comfort, and a whole lotta productivity being close to nature.
Ever wanted to rant about that someone you just can’t stand? Overwhelmed with too many feelings? Check out Raffles Press’ new column, Ask Aunt Agony and Uncle Upset, and our resident Aunties and Uncles will be glad to help you with your Rafflesian troubles! Submit your confessions to tinyurl.com/rafflesadvicecolumn and we’ll give them our best shot.