The 5 Search: Grand Finals

Reading Time: 5 minutes

By Shikhar Gupta (15S06M) and Valerie Chee (15S07B)

Additional Reporting by Wilson Chan (15A01C)

Photos by Shikhar Gupta (15S06M)

Recently, Raffles Press published an exclusive feature on RI alumnus and top 5 finalist of ‘The 5 Search’, Shrey Bhargava. Just two days later, we had the privilege of being invited to the MediaCorp Studios to watch the exciting Grand Finals of the show, which was broadcasted live on Channel 5. On set, we were given the opportunity to interview established hosting and acting personalities who have worked with Shrey in his ‘5 Search’ journey, some of his avid supporters, as well as Shrey himself.

Opening Item of ‘The 5 Search’ Finals

The show started off by treating the audience to an enthralling performance: the top five contestants were introduced alongside a medley of dance items, stunts and even a breathtaking fire show. The hyped-up atmosphere was bolstered by the exceptionally loud and enthusiastic live audience, which had begun chanting the names of the finalists long before the show even started, with audience members equipped with banners, lights, clappers and whistles.

To prove their abilities in various genres of acting, all five finalists were put through a series of three challenges, namely drama, hosting and comedy segments, to be judged by a panel of experienced actors and directors.

In the drama challenge, Shrey acted out a malicious character who faked his death on his birthday, allowing him to escape with his stepmother and a suitcase full of cash. Despite the rather convoluted and inconceivable plotline, Shrey pulled off his character naturally and impressed us with his ability to play on the intense emotions required of the drama.

Similarly, his hosting of “Urban Escapes” was almost immaculate, impressing the panel of judges with his poise and fluency as he introduced to us the landscape of Pulau Ubin. Selena Tan commented that “I’m not sure if at 19 I would’ve been able to come across as polished as that.” Unfortunately, Bryan Wong refuted this by expressing his sentiments of Shrey’s performance being “too perfect” and a “wee bit too polished”. Perhaps Shrey’s biggest mistake was the artificial interview held with a Pulau Ubin local during his hosting segment, as he placed his arm around the uncle for the entire duration of the interview, causing the latter to appear rather uncomfortable in the video.

Shrey co-hosting with Jean Danker
Shrey co-hosting with Jean Danker, as an additional segment of the hosting challenge

Nonetheless, Shrey shone when put back into his niche — accents. During the comedy segment of the show, he played a stereotypical and sleazy Indian uncle trying to hit on a girl. While some of the other finalists similarly put up engaging and natural performances, Shrey’s portrayal of his character stood out to us in that it was extremely energetic and authentic, especially with his perfect wield of the accent and great comedic timing. Unsurprisingly, the judges credited his performance “very enjoyable” and commended Shrey on being a “good all-rounder”.

Shrey acting alongside actress Judee Tan in his comedy segment

In the final reveal of the winners, Shrey was able to make it into the top 3 of the show; however, Kayly Loh beat out both him and Aiken Chia to claim top spot. Even so, Shrey assured us that he had “no regrets” about the whole journey, highlighting how he had done the best he could. It was certainly a journey with countless, valuable lessons learnt and a whole lot of fun for Shrey who had warm words for his fellow contestants. “They’ve been my best friends in the competition… and we’re going to remain friends.” Addressing Kayly in particular, he jokingly remarked “I wish her all the very best, with a two-year contract and $30000, but she has to treat us to supper so…(laughs)”

The finalists awaiting the Top 3 results
The finalists awaiting the Top 3 results
Shrey, after the Grand Finals
Shrey, after the Grand Finals

Shrey also asserted that by being on the show he wished to make the point that “Raffles is not just about going into law (and medicine)… (it) can be all-rounded”. With the show now over, Shrey is aiming to gain admission into an overseas drama school, such as Juilliard School in New York, but is open to taking up other offers if they come.

Indeed, Shrey’s ex-mentor and Artistic Director of Buds Youth Theater, Claire Devine, who came down to witness the live show, commented that “If he doesn’t win this, he will go on to be successful, because this is what he was made to be.” Having watched Shrey grow over the past few years, she commends how Shrey has cultivated the important skill of internalising criticism. She also praises him liberally, asserting that he is a “very genuine human being, so therefore when he presents and speaks to people, there is no affectation about him whatsoever. He doesn’t try, he just is.”

Also present at the live show to perform with the finalists during their comedy segments were ‘The Noose’ actors, Chua En Lai, Alaric Tay, Judee Tan, Michelle Chong and Suhaimi Yusof. Judee Tan, who Shrey worked with in the finals, commented that Shrey “takes directions from the directors very well”, while Alaric Tan was more effusive in his praise, claiming Shrey had been a “star throughout”. In fact, when questioned on who they would have chosen to win second place in the competition, both Alaric Tay and Judee Tan were in favour of Shrey. Chua En Lai revealed to us in a humorous anecdote that while placing bets in the dressing room, he had actually placed his bet on Shrey to win, impressed by his confidence.

As a little bonus, here are some exclusive soundbites we’ve obtained of ‘The Noose’ actors and actresses expressing their excitement to work with Osayang (Shrey’s Noose character) in the near future… but in character.

Alaric Tay, acting as Xin Hua Hua

Chua En Lai, acting as Pornsak Sukhumvit

Judee Tan, acting as Kim Bong Cha

Raffles Press would like to wish Shrey all the best, and we hope to see more of his work in the near future!

Class of 2014: High Achievers

Reading Time: 3 minutes

By Michelle Zhu (15A01B), Kang Yi Xi (15S03N)
Additional reporting by Valerie Chee (15S07B), Joyce Er (15A01A)
Photos by Choo Shuen Ming (16A01E), Joyce Er (15A01A)

The batch of 2014 awaiting their results
The batch of 2014 awaiting their results

The hall was abuzz today as the class of 2014 gathered to receive their much-anticipated A-Level results. Overall, the cohort has done excellently, with 774 (61%) of our students achieving at least 5 distinctions in their subjects. Although this is less than last year’s number of 68%, it is nevertheless commendable given the national dip in results. 64% of the batch also achieved at least 3 H2 distinctions (compared to 68% for the class of 2013), with 50% getting distinctions in all their H2 subjects. 26% of students succeeded in getting a perfect University Admissions Score (UAS) of 90, while the mean UAS remained relatively high at 85.

2

With regard to individual subjects, the cohort attained stellar results overall in Knowledge and Inquiry, English Literature and Biology — for each of these subjects, roughly 8 in 10 students scored a distinction. The batch’s performance in Chemistry, Physics, Geography, Mathematics as well as Tamil Language and Literature was also commendable, with approximately 7 in 10 of each subject’s takers attaining a distinction. Though the number of distinctions for Economics and History showed a 10% decline compared to last year’s, a sizeable majority of students (6 in 10) still managed to get an A for the subject. However, this is also partially because nationally some subjects’ average came down and ours did correspondingly, but this does not reflect a drop of standards in our teaching. As usual, General Paper proved a hard subject to score well in, for only 48% of those taking the subject walked away with a distinction, nevertheless an improvement from the previous year.

3

Continuing to emphasize the importance of holistic development in RI, Mr Chan highlighted certain notable Rafflesians who had done well in non-academic fields, namely sports, the arts, leadership and community service. Though these people may not have perfect A-level results, they have nevertheless been able to maintain admirable grades even despite their busy schedules. Those who were lauded include national rhythmic gymnast Daphne Chia; the former chairperson of RI Chamber Ensemble, Koh Kai Jie; the President of the 33rd Students’ Council, Edward Kim, and Wee Jing Long, who founded RI’s Habitat for Humanity chapter. Do look out for our upcoming articles on some notable Rafflesians!

The batch of 2014 has certainly done the school proud with their effort and results. On behalf of Raffles Press, we would like to congratulate our seniors for their excellent work.

Happy students after receiving their results with their Civics Tutor
Happy students after receiving their results with their Civics Tutor

 

Year-on-Year Comparison

Class of 2013

9 Distinctions: 4 students (i.e. 0.32%)

At least 8 Distinctions: 80 students (i.e. 76 with 8 Distinctions, i.e. 6.13%)

At least 7 Distinctions: 277 students (i.e. 197 with 7 Distinctions, i.e. 15.90%)

At least 6 Distinctions 533 students (i.e. 256 with 6 Distinctions, i.e. 20.16%)

There were 1,239 candidates.

Class of 2014

9 Distinctions: 2 students (i.e. 0.19%)

At least 8 Distinctions: 52 students (i.e. 50 with 8 Distinctions, i.e. 4.12%)

At least 7 Distinctions: 278 students (i.e. 226 with 7 Distinctions, i.e. 17.9%)

At least 6 Distinctions: 542 students (i.e. 264 with 6 Distinctions, i.e. 20.9%)

There were 1,261 candidates.

The Search is on, and Shrey is in it

Reading Time: 8 minutes

By Shikhar Gupta (15S06M)

It is not every day that one is selected as a finalist in a reality-TV show, nor is it every day that this very individual happens to be a Raffles Institution alumnus. An aspiring actor and full-time NSF, Shrey Bhargava, 19, is a finalist in ‘The 5 Search’, a local acting-hosting reality show that finds the next face of Channel 5 by putting contestants through various acting and hosting challenges with cameos by celebrity guests. With a 2-year contract from Mediacorp that could launch one’s acting career and $30,000 on offer, Shrey is doing all that he can to go out and achieve the top spot. Raffles Press takes a look into his life – how he has developed his skills up to this point and what he plans to do in the future.

Continue reading “The Search is on, and Shrey is in it”

Please Mind the Platform Gap (Universities Edition): London School of Economics

Reading Time: 8 minutes

By Kate Tan (15S03U)

Thinking about which university to apply to, or already a J2 beginning your early admission applications? Raffles Press brings you our Please Mind the Platform Gap (Universities Edition), a series of articles dedicated to providing information on Rafflesian alumni’s experiences at their respective universities.

The London School of Economics and Political Science, more commonly known as LSE, is a well-established university in London. While most renowned for its competitive economics and law courses, LSE also offers a variety of higher education courses that range from International Relations to Statistics. However, do note that LSE does not offer natural science courses, so one interested in them would have to venture across town to Imperial instead!

In this article, Raffles Press interviews Kailing, a J3 currently studying her first year of Economics at LSE, to find out more about her experiences so far.

Continue reading “Please Mind the Platform Gap (Universities Edition): London School of Economics”

Critiquing ISLE

Reading Time: 8 minutes

By Kang Yi Xi (15S03N)

The more altruistic amongst us often dream of changing others’ lives for the better – of serving and succeeding, of alleviating people’s suffering. As is to be expected, many of them sign up for programmes like the International Service Learning Elective, more commonly abbreviated as ISLE. In this highly sought-after enrichment programme, teams of students are tasked with planning and executing a service learning project in a South-East Asian developing country. Despite the significant cuts in the programme’s intake (only one team will be heading over this year), it is still a good time for us to reflect on some of the questions that have been plaguing development aid as of late, specifically in the context of ISLE. Numerous articles critical of international service have been published in recent months, and our home-grown enrichment programme has brought similar doubts to the forefront. For one, who winds up benefitting more – the servers, or the served? More importantly, is the latter inadvertently harmed by the efforts of the former?

Continue reading “Critiquing ISLE”